Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Considering all the factors, I disagree on the view.
In the world where people with diversity, cultural and political differences exist, it is possible to have different opinions on controversial topics. Lack of communication and discussion significantly increases the hostility between the different groups, having contrasting views.
The discussion between people with the contrasting views broadens the area of discussion. One might not have to agree on the contrasting points explained through this conversation, but it gives a chance to explore the other side of the discussion.
It allows the people to understand different perspectives of the topic and might give opportunity to modify their views. It is possible that one might change their views completely after listening to the other side of the discussion.
Of course there are topics which are best to avoid if they are going to cause in-harmony or going to impact the peace of the society. Such topics might include religion, tradition, cultural issues. Since every person has different up bringing, cultural and traditional beliefs, sometimes commenting on such topics might be hurtful. This can be avoided by keeping the silence.
In a successful democracy, it is allowed to have contrasting views but it is important to listen and understand the other side of the story.
Although in a world where each person has their own way of perceiving any topic would have different or contrasting views with other people, it is important to have a discussion with an open-mind.
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 16
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. "Over the past year, our late-night nei devoted increased time to national ne' to weather and local news. During thi most of the complaints received from concerned 37
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 245.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39591836735 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99783067479 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518367346939 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5841318336 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69230769231 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256789158036 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908915076734 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785703544816 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121962764982 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701710415342 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.