Forest- TPO14- Salvage logging- Insects
The article states that salvage logging is beneficial both to a damaged forest and to the economy. Although the professor tells that salvage logging may appear to recover the forest, its advantages do not last long and it will damage the forest in the long term. By the way, she refutes each of the author's reasons with the rational ground.
To commence with, the passage avers that this process will remove damaged trees, which will take years to decompose. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by stating that damaged trees will help the soil by riching that with a lot of chemical matters that they have in their stems and leaves. So, this process will lack the nutrients of the soils which are essential for their vegetations.
Second, the article claims that decaying wood is insects' dwellings and by removing it salvage logging helps minimize the dangers of insect infestation. Nevertheless, the professor contends that it is obvious that rotting wood is the dwelling of the insects but is this really bad for the forest? insects have lived in the woods for many years without any impressive damage and also the birds and other kinds of animals use these trees as a source of food. As you can see, salvage logging harms the forest more than insects and rotting woods.
At last, the reading declares that salvage logging has many economic benefits such as using the damaged woods and creating jobs. Nonetheless, the professor opposes this point by stating that these economic advantages are small and do not last long. By the way, the vehicles which are used for the process are too expensive. Besides, the created jobs are temporary and need experts from outside the regions. So, this process won't create jobs for local dwellers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Mostafa93106325 | 80 | view |
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing TaskJane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she loo 76
- TPO 11 - Integrated : a decline in reading the literature 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 83
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'salvages'?
Suggestion: salvages
...is insects dwellings and by removing it salvage logging helps minimize the dangers of i...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Insects
... but is this really bad for the forest? insects have lived in the woods for many years ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, second, so, well, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90301003344 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28826586509 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52508361204 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8062898941 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486386037329 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155595668813 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808529310025 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274859175097 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813012785258 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.