The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The line graph illustrates the regional household recycling rates of germany, uk and france from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, it can be observed that the recycling rates of uk and germany showed a steady but significant rise over the period, while the percentage of recycled waste in france experienced a downward trend.
In 2005, the recycling rates of the uk and germany were nearly 35% and 20%, respectively.germany's rate increased sharply throughout the period, exceeding france's rate in 2009 and reaching almost 60% in the end of the period.In the meantime, the proportion of recycled waste in uk grew to 40% in 2007, and then remained steady until 2009.During 2009-2011, it experienced a surge to more than 50% and continued with a gradual increase to 60% in 2015.
To early 2005, the recycling rate of france (50%) was the highest among these three countries.However, it dramatically declined to 30% in 2013.Then, there was a growth of 10% in 2015, but france's recycling rate was the lowest in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | livevanzz | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Johnysingg | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that watching TV is good and makes life more enjoyable others however think it is a waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 95
- The bar chart blow shows the percentage of Australian men and women in differrent groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 73
- Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers Consequently they are against living in the city To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your reasons for your a 70
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ing almost 60% in the end of the period.In the meantime, the proportion of recycle...
^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: During
...07, and then remained steady until 2009.During 2009-2011, it experienced a surge to mo...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...the highest among these three countries.However, it dramatically declined to 30% in 201...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...it dramatically declined to 30% in 2013.Then, there was a growth of 10% in 2015, but...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01744186047 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10486890622 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.479755426 43.030603864 287% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 215.75 112.824112599 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284520433803 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203107137311 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995958413383 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203107137311 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995958413383 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 13.2329268293 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.