Is watching events or performances ( sports, dramas, concert, ect) live better than watching those on television?
Entertainment is the crucial thing to relieve our mind from our daily busy routine. Watching events as live performance is good to examine each and every moment, where performances are also provided on television. This essay will discuss both views in following paragraphs.
To start with live performances, such as sport, Dramas, concert and so on, we can feel the real taste of each and every moment. By this type of life performances, person can focus on particular things which he or she want to learn. In addition to this he or she get deeply knowledge about certain things, which is aid to enhance his or her horizon about particular performance.
On the other hand, television is most convenient and flexible option to save time and money both. Where, people can easily enjoy their time and utilise it. Because of this, people can kill two birds with one stone. When we are getting bored then it is easy to change the channels, Whichever we want. In addition, if person is at home, at that time he or she will be able to enjoy comfortness of his or her home. Thus, he or she easily enjoy programmes with cup of tea or popcorn. Sometimes, due to close angle camera, we can see exact contents. By viewing this contents, we will be able to define that what is the mistake done? And which decision is correct?
In my ideology, television is feasible option, if we are not able to go there. However, I similarly believe that Television cannot produce real thriller and experiments that we experience in atmosphere of live performances.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-27 | akipatel2222@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- Is watching events or performances ( sports, dramas, concert, ect) live better than watching those on television? 61
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r daily busy routine. Watching events as live performance is good to examine each...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...us on particular things which he or she want to learn. In addition to this he or she...
^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...to learn. In addition to this he or she get deeply knowledge about certain things, ...
^^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'enjoys'.
Suggestion: enjoys
...his or her home. Thus, he or she easily enjoy programmes with cup of tea or popcorn. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, then, thus, in addition, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77323420074 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68397367875 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2981353978 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5294117647 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104367142795 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300259092785 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629427482105 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738035147658 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523679413569 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.