coins/Norse
TPO 44
both the author and the lecturer discuss whether the coin is genuine historical evidence or not. The passage claims that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons. First, both the author and the professor talk about the distance between the maine site and norse site in Canada. According to the passage, the distance between the maine site and norse settlements in Canada is more than a thousand kilometers, suggesting the coin has no real connection with the settlements. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects author's view and illustrates the idea that many objects was brought from faraway places to the state of maine in the United state. many Native americans brought commodity back to the maine from norse settlements. Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss other coins discovery. The author argues that no other coins have been found at the norse’s sites that were inhabited by the norse. therefore, norse did not bring any silver coins with them to their north american settlements. However, the professor refutes this saying that norse brought coins to north America and then brought back to Europe. Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of value of coins as american’s currency. The passage goes on to mention that north americans did not recognize silver coin as money, so silver coins would most likely be useless to them. In contrast, the professor points out that silver coins were beautiful and north americans used them as necklace or other jewelry. therefore, norse could utilize coins to trade with americans. All in all, the author maintains that the coin is a historical fake and someone wanted to mislead the public, while the professor not only completely casts doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that the coin is a genuine piece of historical evidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | ghazalsaed1995 | 73 | view |
- Human presence on Venus 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Tpo 26 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 73
- Tpo22 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the author and the lecturer discuss whe...
^^^^
Line 1, column 793, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...the state of maine in the United state. many Native americans brought commodity back...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1068, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...sites that were inhabited by the norse. therefore, norse did not bring any silver coins w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1665, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...used them as necklace or other jewelry. therefore, norse could utilize coins to trade wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10185185185 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62680795405 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9686968898 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.611783580487 0.272083759551 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211698711689 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104892095254 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.611783580487 0.162205337803 377% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.