task 1: the consumer price index
The graph compares the changes of proportion of people who are aged 65 or more in three different countries, namely japan, sweden, and the USA, over a period of 80 years from 1940 to 2020 with projection for 20 next years.
Overall, it is clear that in all three areas the percentage of elderly people have been risen. Prediction shows this trend will continue for future.
At the beginning of the period the percentage of people aged 65 or more in the US and sweden stood around 9% and 7% respectively. A similar trend was seen in changes in American and Swiss old people until 1990s, before meeting them in 2000 at approximately 14%. Despite some difference, both of them rose gradually until 2040, reaching around 20%.
In 1940, japan, where is its elderly population consisted of around 5% of its population, was experienced a different trend between 1940 and 1980. At this time, this proportion decrease to nearly 2.5% in 1980, before rising to 1940 figure in 2000. A gradual rise was seen in Japanese elderly people until 2030. Suddenly, this figure rise dramatically to 25% before reaching the highest percent between all countries, which was mentioned in this graph, about 3% higher than sweden figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | khoavodoj | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | justtheanh | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption. 78
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in someland between 1960 and 1995. 78
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 84
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph compares the changes of propor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with projection for 20 next years. Overall, it is clear that in all three a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.038647343 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56360202785 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5697488394 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.