score by teams by season from 2002 to 2005
The chart indicates the score gained in one season of three teams, namely A,B,C from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team C achieved the most remarkable score over 4 seasons while team A and C alternatively stayed at the bottom of the list. (while the score of team C hovered slightly around 12 over 4 years, the figure of others have noticeable fluctuation)
In 2002, team A just got 5 points, half of the number of team C. For the next 2 years, the point of team A witnessed a steep rocket to 35, doubling the figure from C, which dropped to 17 after a mild increase in 2003. To the end of the period, A still stayed overhead C (with 8 and 5 correspondingly) even though the score of A fell dramatically by 3 times.
The most striking feature that can be seen in the graph is the score gained by team B in 2002 with approximately 82 points, far exceeding its two counterparts. For the next 2 years, it experienced a steady declined to 43 before a recovery to 56 in 2005. Even being through the large fluctuation, team B never left its king position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | jicheoltrash | 84 | view |
- the hobbies of British people from 2003 to 2015 78
- score by teams by season from 2002 to 2005 84
- the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000 89
- the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009 89
- the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...d in one season of three teams, namely A,B,C from 2002 to 2005. Overall, team C ...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ively stayed at the bottom of the list. while the score of team C hovered slightly ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35204081633 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71468368266 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8542371794 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46521765244 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17598929332 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123266473921 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277312907026 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094323753459 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.