Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
Most people advocate the view that group tasks improve intellectual skills more if people show their active participation. Performing assigned duties with same batch objectives enhance the analytical skills of each member. This essay will argue why expertise is not directly linked with people’s performance in group.
Firstly, knowledge and skills are earn through hard work in studies. To explain further, education throughout the study phase is the backbone of skills development which not only limits to learn from books but students also encouraged to participate in inter schools competitions. Such action of taking part shows the eagerness in developing and honing these skills and the zeal to face the challenges that empowers them from the core of the heart to learn and develop. For example, a recent study by Education Council of UAE showed 70% of undergraduates prefer to participate in competitions considering it as an educational opportunity. Therefore, devotion towards study also advances the cognitive skills.
Secondly, in hand experience in area of expertise emerge the critical thinking and analytical abilities. Moreover, one’s passion for the role encourages performing the best in team. Naturally, this develops both soft and interpersonal skills along with finesse in problem solving and brain storming. For instance, a sales person needs to have sales associated skills to perform better in job. However, these proficiencies prove his/her abilities for the role. Hence, year of experience is directly proportionate to rational skills development.
In conclusion, this essay argued why intelligence is not the outcome of group works. I firmly believe that skills development follow the tendency of educational level and experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | kongkona | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | CANADA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sonali Guha | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | mehnaaz | 61 | view |
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 73
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion 63
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to study abroad? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
... Firstly, knowledge and skills are earn through hard work in studies. To explai...
^^^^
Line 9, column 530, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...e is directly proportionate to rational skills development. In conclusion, this e...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...e of group works. I firmly believe that skills development follow the tendency of educ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6992481203 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04224314801 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0052080104 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13613455513 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426674293011 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636286120826 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841495116055 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629668987046 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.