In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
In recent years, working or travelling for a year before starting university studies has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend is not without disadvantages, the upside will justify these.
There are many reasons why people should take a year off before attending university. First, since people travel some foreign countries, they can have many benefits such as broaden horizon and enrich knowledge. In fact, they have a chance to meet new people, which can help them to improve their communication skills. Second, by taking a gap year for working, they have more experience than before. This means that they can use their knowledge in work and apply for study such as teamwork, which allow them to get better scores and good performance in their study.
People should not work or travel for a year in some case. First, in order to travelling, it would affect on their education. For instance, young people do not continue study and easily forget knowledge, which cause bad results when they study again in university. Second, if they work before studying university, they would not have enough health and sometimes face dangerous since they could only apply for some handle jobs such as worker or waiter. Plenty of evidence suggest that they could do overtime in factory for long time, which lead to a bad health and they also waste money to cure sickness.
In conclusion, the disadvantage about a gap years between highschool and university will be more far significant. By considering pros and cons, the student can make the best decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | mone49 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | anhoanguyenquin | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Bakhtiyar1 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | phanduydat | 84 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on thi 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should write at least 150 words. 61
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 67
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should wr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...First, in order to travelling, it would affect on their education. For instance, young pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n factory for long time, which lead to a bad health and they also waste money to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05703422053 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5512712986 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7696625558 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249745488624 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940141464626 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900017974632 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145559020854 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429165134395 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.