There are many different styles of classes at schools nowadays. Some students prefer classes where they interact with their teachers and with other students in debates and group assignments. Others prefer classes where they just listen to their teacher speak.
There are many different learning styles and it is important to choose classes that match our academic fields. Personally, I believe that it is extremely beneficial to take classes with very much interactive teachers. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, classes that include a lot of discussions develop our communication skills. Our long-term ability to persuade others to accept our ideas, so it is critically important to seize opportunities to talk with a variety of people. We cannot learn this skill without practising it. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Before coming to university, I was very shy to speak in public and present my ideas to others. However, with my university environment, I got the chance to attend a lot of interactive lecturers. After one year of engaging with activities like presentations, speeches and discussions help me to come out of my shell and became a confident speaker. As a result, when I began my carrier as a junior lecturer in the university, I have been successful in teaching a large number of students at once without any hesitation.
Secondly, classes that are very interactive help us to connect with our classmates, and this can lead to future opportunities. When we regularly converse with our peers, we can get to know their personalities, weaknesses and even become good friends for life. In contrast, we can actively engage with lecturers proving ideas and comparing ideas with others. This will make good learning environment. For Instance, when I am in university I saw that four people work together for semester project become very close friends and they together start their own startup company.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is great to have more interactive classes where students actually talk to each other and with their professor. This is because those classes help us to improve our communication skills and help us to develop good social connections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | salamikehinde | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | sandy94 | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | toeflmaster | 70 | view |
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- There are many different styles of classes at schools nowadays. Some students prefer classes where they interact with their teachers and with other students in debates and group assignments. Others prefer classes where they just listen to their teacher sp 76
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different learning styles and it is important to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 805, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ity, I have been successful in teaching a large number of students at once without any hesitation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 864, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents at once without any hesitation. Secondly, classes that are very interact...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06586826347 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98296164358 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6382398699 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229763551306 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681424393376 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726228492934 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154339502958 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505762178948 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.