Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The areas that governments spend money on have always been a controversial topic. The government's support is the main source of changes in the society, so it is an important matter to support areas which have more influence on the society. I disagree that it is more important for governments to spend money for improving internet access rather than public transportation for two main reasons.
To begin with, there is a lot more profit in the internet access area than transportation for private companies. many private companies are enhancing the internet access all over the world because they benefit from that, so considering this situation, there is no need for governments to spend money on this matter. On the other hand, public transportation is an area that not many private companies are willing to invest on. With all that being said, governments should spend more money for public transportation because if they don't, public transportation will not improve because of lack of investments. For example I read an article about public transportation which claimed that many countries are suffering from poor public transportation and one of the very fiew options to improve this situations is that the governments spend money for this important matter.
Secondly, the earth has serious pollution problem which can be imporved using public transportation. One of the main sources of the earth's pollution is the use of private cars instead of using public transportation like bus and train. Encouraging people to use public transportation will eliminate a great deal of pollution from the earth. In order to encourage people to use public transportation we need to first, improve the public transportation quality and second, lowering the price of using it and, This is only possible if the government spend more money on this matter. For example, I used to use my own car to get to my university and work; The main reason for this wa that it would take me a lot of time to get there by public transportation because of poor quality. Then The government invest a lot of money on improving the conditions of public transportation. Now I always use public transportaion because it is much faster and on the other hand, I am helping the environment by using it.
In sum, I believe that improving internet access is not more important than public transportation and governments should spend more money on public transportation because private companies are doing much of the work about internet access and the earth's pollution problem can be largely prevented by encouraging people to use public transportation. We all should expect our governments to focus on public transportation more than it does now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernments spend money on have always been a controversial topic. The governments s...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...n transportation for private companies. many private companies are enhancing the int...
^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to invest on. With all that being said, governments should spend more money for ...
^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r public transportation because if they dont, public transportation will not improve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...one of the very fiew options to improve this situations is that the governments spen...
^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...rtation. One of the main sources of the earths pollution is the use of private cars in...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
... the work about internet access and the earths pollution problem can be largely preven...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10986547085 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08651242497 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387892376682 0.524837075471 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8342080144 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.058823529 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2352941176 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391944511771 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158473945516 0.076458572812 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10088223528 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291603813716 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465121655039 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.