Nowadays people make new friends through social networks and internet chat groups. Some people think it is good, others think face to face interaction is essential.
The Digital era has changed the way communication is shared and consumed. Although some people believe that companionship is born through social media and chat groups, I agree with those who argue that face to face communication is an important part of developing and retaining social relationships.
One of the crucial advantage of communicating through the internet is that it allows cultural exchange among people from different nations. This is because of such modes of expression that people can connect and shares their cultural values, social customs, and rituals with each other. As a result of these interactions, children are bringing change in society by questioning domestic violence such as physical, religious, verbal and emotional abuse. For instance, Countries of the Middle East banned women from driving due to religious reasons, and this was lifted in 2014 with the help of million voters of the Facebook community page who voted against such law.
Nevertheless, I believe face to face interaction is a crucial way to establish long-standing social relations. The reason for this is that such interactions provide an opportunity to ascertain the positive and negative aspects of information exchange via personal expression. For example, business corporates are increasing their focus on physical attributes such as eye contact, expressions, and voice tone as selection criteria for interviews to maintain a cordial and friendly working environment among the professionals. As a result, people can accommodate real-time modifications that ensure enduring professional and personal relationships. Conversely, If people choose social media as an only source of communication in the future, then the friendship could be much short-lived due to incapability of ascertaining these aesthetic emotions.
In conclusion, although it is of critical importance that people communicate globally to improve the developing societies, I feel that to retain long-lasting relationships, people should encourage face to face communication with each other.
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away,whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Expalain the effects and change in attitudes. 78
- In many countries both men and women are working full time , therefore it is logical for men and women to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree? 78
- people should be responsible for pollution problems caused by transportation, while others think the government should be held acccountable .Discuss both views and give your opinion 60
- Write a letter to the friend asking advice for an employment opportunity in his countryWhy you are looking in his countrydescribe qualification and skillsask some questions about salary, benefit culture etc. 11
- Some people believe that in order for the hobby to be enjoyable it needs to be difficult in some ways.Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nity page who voted against such law. Nevertheless, I believe face to face int...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, nevertheless, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72964169381 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2614631745 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0075990359 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.583333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246990128348 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865276910496 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864606429798 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163370378845 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542022099286 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.