the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008.
The proportion of British people's eating behaviour in 3 different groups (men, female and children) which ate five parts of fruit and vegetables has shown by the bar chart between 2001 and 2008. The information can be grouped into 2 periods which are 2001 to 2004 and 2005 to 2008. The unit of this chart is percentage. Overall it can be seen that men were the highest number since 2001 to the next 7 years while children were the lowest.
In 2001, the highest type of people who ate five portions of that foods were men which was more than 20 percent and rose significantly to peak at 30 in 2004. In contrast, the second group were female that the proportion stood at higher than 15 percent while the next 2 years it remained constant. After that there was a steady increase more than 20 percent in 2004. Subsequently, children were the lowest which were more than 15 percent between 2001 and 2003 then increased gradually to almost 23 in 2004.
In next 4 years the highest proportion was men which reached a high of 35 percent in 2006 then it dropped
gradually to 30 in 2008. Both of men and female were rose in 2005 to 2006 and then it fell to 35 and around 27 respectively in 2008. while children increased significantly from 20 to 25 percent between 2005 and 2007. Finally, such group dropped to lower than 25 in 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hich are 2001 to 2004 and 2005 to 2008. The unit of this chart is percentage. Overa...
^^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...7 years while children were the lowest. In 2001, the highest type of people who...
^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the next 2 years it remained constant. After that there was a steady increase more t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creased gradually to almost 23 in 2004. In next 4 years the highest proportion w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh of 35 percent in 2006 then it dropped gradually to 30 in 2008. B...
^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gradually
...n 2006 then it dropped gradually to 30 in 2008. Both of men and female w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...men and female were rose in 2005 to 2006 and then it fell to 35 and around 27 res...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... 35 and around 27 respectively in 2008. while children increased significantly from 2...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48148148148 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41363550188 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465020576132 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3837432701 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171072621344 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070023952329 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847716156085 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981536555152 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827237908703 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.