Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Moral judgement might be one of the deciding factor for an effective leader but respecting his peers is on the higher end of the spectrum. Peers are one of the most important driving force behind success of a leader apart from other distinguishing qualities.
For an organization to run successfully, leaders are required to be quite effective in their judgmental qualities. But this might not be the only one factor that benefits an organization. Leader's success is measured by the efforts of team leadership and several other qualities which are majorly concerned with peers being involved in it. Efforts of the peers behind leader to be successful is one of the most critical reason to be accounted. Leader cannot be successful unless peers are willing to work under leader's influence. Hence, a leader must respect the efforts put in by peers for an organization to be successful.
This does not completely deny the fact that in some cases, moral judgement plays critical step for a leader to be successful. At such times, leader must just concentrate on the overall progress of the organization instead of just being dependent on peers to make an effective decision.
One of the greatest example of effective leadership can be Steve Jobs, founder of Apple Inc. He always tried to respect decisions from his peers. Innovations from peers ideas were one of the most important driving force behind his success. Not to be denied by the fact that, Steve was role model for most of his employees, who tried to inculcate values such as team leadership, moral judgement, punctuality, etc. from Steve Jobs. Hence, sometimes even the leader plays a role model for his peers to be successful.
Peers try to inculcate values from leaders as cited in the example above. This strives to the idea that leader must be effective in his leadership qualities which are then further passed on to the peers. If leader tries to respect his peers, then he might be respected in return. For a leader to be effective, he must try to respect decision from his peers instead of just thwarting them.
This concludes the given topic by the fact that we cannot ignore moral judgment from an effective leader at the stake of respecting his peers, which according to me might be more critical. Hence, for a leader to be effective he must not only possess leadership qualities but also try to respect his co-workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-22 | GeneralBlitzer | 82 | view |
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 72
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 29
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, apart from, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92874692875 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70882041585 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405405405405 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2386478819 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293772015827 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117827898348 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666821605368 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202582890701 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512358819122 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.