The way a message is delivered is a more important factor than the message itself.
It is a common saying that what you say is not important but how you say is everything. Keeping that in mind, one of the most inevitable tasks that anyone can face in this hectic world where everyone strives to achieve excellence is delivery of message. The author of the argument in it's claim that the very method and means employed to deliver the message is valid and correct.
Firstly, consider an instance where an infant is struggling in particular subject of Math or science and the tutor needs to correct him. The tutor could be callous, impudent and rebuke the child which in turn might discourage and hinder the progress. But the same mistakes, if corrected with affection and in placid tone is fruitful. Many infants are subjected to violence and hatred in early child hood and as an adults might be aggressive. One can shower them with extra concern and love.
Secondly, the scope of message delivery is not only confined to home but workplace as well. If there is a disagreement between sub-ordinates and seniors or among executives of company, an effective deliverer or message would take into account the sentiments of others, is careful not to use pompous or inflated language just to seek attention and puts forth his opinion in the best manner possible with appropriate and relevant reasons. Likewise, they are equally applicable in public offices & places and almost everywhere one goes.
There are myriad of factors that one needs to take into account while delivering a mssage. It is more of an art and involves practice and repetition. A good speaker takes into account his facial expressions, shows due consideration for his audience in addressing, is optimistic and uses correct diction in his or her speech. Moreover, he uses the techniques of non verbal communication and intonation effectively. History is replete with examples how some great leaders used this art effectively in communicating their message to their audiences. Popular examples include the sixteenth and thirty-fifth president of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Because of their demeanor and command over their vocabulary asides from commitment to the American people, they were able to cement their legacy in history and are widely acclaimed universally today.
Lastly, but not the least, by the virtue of above examples, which are but only a sample of examples and ways which supports the contention of the argument, one can reasonably assert that the delivery of message is more important than the message itself.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-22 | tanawala1809 | 83 | view |
2019-09-06 | kimb | 58 | view |
2018-10-14 | lee94jay | 50 | view |
2018-07-29 | RaghuVJoshi | 75 | view |
2018-07-11 | anusha777 | 50 | view |
- The following recommendation was made by the Human Resources Manager to the board of directors of the Fancy Toy Company. “In the last three quarters of this year, under the leadership of our President Pat Salvo, our profits have fallen considerably. Thu 58
- Clearly, the successful use of robots on mission to explore outer space could be increasingly used to perform factory work more effectively, efficiently and profitably. The use of robots in factory would offer several advantages. Firstly, robots never get 74
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a farming publication.” With continuing publicity about the need for healthful diets and the new research about the harmful effects of eating too much sugar, nationwide demand for sugar should no doubt 73
- The way a message is delivered is a more important factor than the message itself. 83
- An ancient traditional treatment to help reduce obesity coconut oil has recently been proven effective In a study completed last year 50 volunteers were fed a special diet rich in coconut oil for two weeks No volunteer was allowed to eat outside food duri 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07619047619 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73295432282 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4950525352 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.210526316 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214455884244 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513645250563 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086800073664 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125697773894 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122067134696 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.