he graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030
The line graph includes information from Annual energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy, which is genereted from six different sources, in the us over a 32-year period from 1980 to 2012 and projected consumption until 2030. The units are measured in Quadrillion.
Overall, it is clear that most of American’s energy needs have been met by fossil fuels and predictions were done by this Institute show that this trend will continue in future.
In 1980, oil consumption in the us stood at 35q while coal and natural gas consumed were about 17q and 20q respectively. Despite some fluctuation in the amount of oil, this source has risen by 5q. A rising of 10q is predicted for oil until 2030. while two other fossil fuels experienced fluctuated trend, both of them rose gradually, reaching the same point (roughly 25q). it is anticipated that consumption of natural gas remains at this level whereas coal will rise by nearly 5q.
At the beginning of the period, energy from Nuclear, Solar and Hydropower consumed about 4q. A gradual increase was seen in the atomic energy, with figure reaching 8q in 2012. In the future, consumption of this source will rise by 1q. An insignificant decrease had been occurred in sustainable source, before this figure falling back to 1980 figure. Now consumption of clean energy source stand under 5q, and it is projected that remains under 7q in 2030.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 11
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Whycould this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 56
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...units are measured in Quadrillion. Overall, it is clear that most of Americ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 173, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tute show that this trend will continue in future. In 1980, oil consumption i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his trend will continue in future. In 1980, oil consumption in the us stood...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...of 10q is predicted for oil until 2030. while two other fossil fuels experienced fluc...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y, reaching the same point roughly 25q. it is anticipated that consumption of natu...
^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ereas coal will rise by nearly 5q. At the beginning of the period, energy f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08085106383 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71661387505 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1520531785 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8461538462 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289732432842 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859404811294 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116399356575 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183427137723 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149227734162 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.