Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island
but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads and
hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of
actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery
explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style:
molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. It also explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that
the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value.
The article states that collectors have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. In addition to, archaeologists recently discovering molds of human heads and hands on Kali. While both of those statements are true, that doesn’t mean that the conclusions that the article came up with are true. Also there are other assumptions that can be concluded from those statements other than those the article stated.
First, the article says that it can conclude from the previous evidences that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. On the other hand, those molds of actual bodies can be found there because some of the people there, were burying their dead bodies from their families and friends that have died because of war or sickness or any other cause, and both wind and water could have affected them to be in that way. While Kalinese artists actually we’re using sculpting tools to create these statues.
Furthermore, according to the article this discovery explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style. But those artists lived many thousands years ago we can’t judge that only because we found some molds of actual bodies near their work, then they must have been using them in their work. Also, how can we trust that the molds of those bodies are really from the same age. Did those archaeologists gave enough evidence? Maybe those archaeologists are just desperate to find any clues to support their claims. Because of that, we must order more evidences from them and search more about the age of those molds.
Moreover, how can collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value? Even if those artists had used molds of actual bodies, some people respect art as it is and will keep buying those things. Aesthetic people usually tend to separate art from their rules in life. They might also don’t agree with those scientists, as they can doubt them as many people around us these days.
Finally, we can say that this article have flaws and holes in it which we stated before and talked about.
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all ofCorpora’s cit 43
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools. 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposingviewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrastingviews of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1817 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.82 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.276 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 77 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.944 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.373 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.558 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.145 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...that the article came up with are true. Also there are other assumptions that can be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ctual bodies can be found there because some of the people there, were burying their dead b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... the same age. Did those archaeologists gave enough evidence? Maybe those archaeolog...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 28.8173652695 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37747299046 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6845047681 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23051105149 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083456322914 0.0743258471296 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114102990738 0.0701772020484 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132684319455 0.128457276422 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998345379108 0.0628817314937 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.