Do you agree or disagree: “In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.”?
I disagree with the statement that speed is more important than quality. In my opinion, I believe that taking your time to avoid making any mistakes is more crucial than hurrying up to show that you are more efficient than others. People should strive to give the optimum amount of time to the assigned task, not more and not less. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, errors could have unintended consequences that might affect a person's career. Trying to complete tasks very swiftly will increase the chances for misdeeds. As a result, an individual might get punished for that. My own experience is a compelling example on that. When I started working as a cashier in a retail store, I had a lot of people lined up to check out their purchased items. I felt it would be appropriate to ring up the merchandise as quickly as possible so the customers can go do other things and save some time for them. Thus, I did not pay much attention to their questions and I did not answer the inquiries adequately. Therefore, I ended up providing bad service to some clients who were not satisfied. They went ahead and rated my work badly on the surveys. Had I given each individual enough time to solve their problem, I would not have gotten this negative feedback.
Secondly, focusing on what you are doing with no rush would guarantee a positive result. To illustrate, after spending many years on my checker job, I realized that I should achieve a balance between rate and service. I began to consider every complain more seriously to ensure lasting impression when people visit our location. Hence, I engaged more with buyers' to help them with anything they needed. This hard work paid off when I was offered a promotion after so many positive reports on my performance. Consequently, it's safe to say that it's not wise to sacrifice a job well-done to a job that is unsatisfying.
To sum up, being agile is not the only skill required in a workplace. Nevertheless, reaching a midpoint between pace and grade is of the utmost significance
- many people believe that greed, or the desire to have more wealth than other people have, is a bad characteristic; people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind. However, some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a 90
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children today would be happier with fewer possessions 95
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some t 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 904, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not have gotten this negative feedback. Secondly, focusing on what you are doing...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evertheless, reaching a midpoint between pace and grade is of the utmost signific...
^^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and grade is of the utmost significance
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72086720867 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67239728402 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607046070461 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8370405476 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1818181818 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7727272727 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111635172115 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270681704562 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041189904005 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615858099276 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541030659154 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.