Some people think that libraries are waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is claimed by some that computers are better than libraries in providing information and suggest that the library should be replace by a computer, while others disagree to replace a library into a computer. In my opinion, I believed that computer is a great device to access any information and it serves with various purposes.
On the one hand, computer can be beneficial tool to seek knowledge and easy to access due to its convenience and ease of use and I agree. In other words, it is favorable to anyone and beneficial in every field not only to the students but also to the employee and a professional. Moreover, the computer can store vast amounts of data and provide a large scope of features and details such as books, documents, and pictures. This will help the students to save time and effort to complete a particular task. Furthermore, it will also save energy compared to having a multiple books because technology has developed laptops that weigh as little as two pounds. The computer is entertaining to use because it stimulates senses like the sense of sight and sense of hearing. For instance, young children have a short attention span this could help them learn easily.
On the other hand, it is often believed that the library, has all the resources that everyone can take a great benefit and believed that it is the biggest treasure to society. Another reason why there are people doesn't want to give up libraries because some don't realize whatever technology introduced will never take place of a library and there are numerous books that are available with a different genre. For example, they cannot hold ancient scriptures that are not available on the internet and adorned by the public librarians.
In conclusion, while people vary in their different opinions, I think that computer stands a better tool and has countless benefit than library.
- the graph below shows the consumption of 3 spread from 1981 to 2007
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'replaced'?
Suggestion: replaced
... and suggest that the library should be replace by a computer, while others disagree to...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ty. Another reason why there are people doesnt want to give up libraries because some ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... want to give up libraries because some dont realize whatever technology introduced ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.934169279 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66432969535 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9107847357 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197935333167 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544992746693 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576968843666 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11640669203 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568504456502 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.