The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
A glance at the provided graph and table reveals the figures for water usage in the world. Information in the graph displays the quantity of water used globally in each sector from 1900 to 2000 whereas the table shows data on water consumed in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the water demand for agriculture, industrial, and domestic fields rose significantly during the period shown. Moreover, from the table, the consumption of water in Brazil was dwarfed by the one in Congo in 2000.
In 1900, the water usage from agriculture ranked first with nearly 500 km following by industrial and domestic sectors with a similar figure (nearly 100 km). Then, the figure for agriculture increased rapidly by over 500 km, while the data on industrial use and domestic use saw modest growth and shared a comparable figure. Nevertheless, ultimately, the figure for industrial use increased more rapidly than the one for domestic use and reached its maximum threshold at over 1000 km. Furthermore, the peak of was about three times as high as that of industrial field.
In 2000, the residents of Brazil and Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million, respectively. Besides, irrigated land in Brazil, with 26,500 km, also much higher than that in Congo. In comparison to water consumption for each, therefore, the figure for Brazil was more than.
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- Amount spend on consumer goods 11
- Please briefly state your scientific and professional interests and objectives, as well as your career goals. Include a description of your past accomplishments that are not evident from the examination of other documents submitted. Report your results, i 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01793721973 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66324678319 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2044794295 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206111669078 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087506728539 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738797866654 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146222733126 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921722187658 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.