Which one you prefer: working five days but fewer hours per day or three days and longer hours per day
The time one spends at work-place is one of the most crucial periods in life, as it leads to personal happiness and satisfaction and shapes the ensuing future. Hence, one of the most controversial issues amongst many people is to schedule working time efficiently. As far as I am concerned in the state of ambivalence, I might lean toward working for a shorter period for five days. Conceivably, many people believe that three-days-working is a more profitable option, but many reasons such as the daily free time and total mood enhancement can declare a higher beneficiary of the five-days-working system. I will interpret my statement in the following.
First, the time to enjoy daily activities is an advantageous to life quality and happiness due to the valuable interactions included in daily off-work experiences. Doubtlessly, these interactions help to broaden the life quality and enrich one's satisfaction. To be able to spend time on fun activities such as watching a movie, visiting relatives and playing with family members, we need to have a regulated amount of time, which the compound working day can not bring. Granted, you have two free days to enjoy, but you can not play with your children when they are at school. As an illustrative example, when I first entered high school at shahid Behsti high school in Iran there was a girl, named Sara. Sara's fether worker in a company from Monday to Wednesday, which remained him two days to spend with his daughter. In the beginning, everyone thought Sara was lucky to spend many days with his father, but it was not true. Unfortunately, we had social activities during Thursdays and Fridays during the whole three years. Sara's father was meant to spend majority of his time with his beloved daughter, but circumstances did not go as planned. As one can see, having daily short periods to do fun activities is better as one can make more flexible plans and it associates with daily free hours a work provides.
It is not presumptuous to judge one's daily mood according to strees level. No one can truly assure another's stress solely based on office-time, but it is assumable that if one works for longer hours, the perceived stress level would increase. A person who seems relaxed works for fewer hours most of the time and enjoys daily relaxation routines. My personal experiences are the foundation behind my next point. Office work hours directly influence the tension which is imperative to total tonic-mood. Surely, it is wiser to reduce working time than to deny the pressure and have gloomy mood.
I am of the conviction that one needs to experience enjoyment daily and have a good mood. This is a personal suggestion in which its effects are evident in motivation and enjoyment. Regarding the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that spending five days at work is a better option as long as one spends fewer hours at work per day. All in all, a coin has two sides and an edge, so it is wise to include personal preferences and experiences into account before final decision-taking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to broaden the life quality and enrich ones satisfaction. To be able to spend time ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1222, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... periods to do fun activities is better as one can make more flexible plans and it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89768339768 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89806857217 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534749034749 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2475372063 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.48 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.72 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.45110844103 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310890952538 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766822591783 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090373009731 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197501222619 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606584842731 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.