An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Doctroc's should permit the hassle free access to previously treated similar type of patients to help in selecting the appropriate doctor for ailing patient. I partially disagree with this idea. In my view, an open access of previous records cannot be the main indicaor of doctor's competence.
First of all, different people have distinct physical condition. So, based on just one similarity without matching the exact same condition, it is hard to tell one will get the best treatment from that doctor. For example, if one patient has cancer with another chronic disease, it will be more complicated than the patient with only cancer. If first patient could not survive that doesnot mean the doctor was incompetent.
Secondly, everyones immunity is not same. Some people may require complete bed rest where some people can start wokring after few hours. So, without visiting doctor and do proper tests according to doctor's suggestion it is not a prudent descision to depend only on previous success rate.
Moreover, an alarming thing is noticable which is people depend on internet result when they are sick primarily. So, if doctor's open their data of previously treated patient some people may be search on the internet and start taking similar medicine which might be perilous.
However, it is also nedded to provide easy access of previous cases results not to judge the doctor's aptitude in treating similar medical condition, but to have an idea about the treatment which might help an ailing patient to get an idea. In addition, if new patients can see the past cases histories before going to teh doctor, it will be hard to for quacks to run business.
Finally, I support the idea of revealing past records of treatment for new patients, but it shouldn't be the main indicator of that doctor's abilty to perform that operation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 66
- “The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area. Although only a small percentage of the la 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'open access'.
Suggestion: open access
...ly disagree with this idea. In my view, an open access of previous records cannot be the main ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se, it will be more complicated than the patient with only cancer. If first patie...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ted than the patient with only cancer. If first patient could not survive that do...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oesnot mean the doctor was incompetent. Secondly, everyones immunity is not same...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'doctor'.
Suggestion: doctor
...doctor and do proper tests according to doctors suggestion it is not a prudent descisio...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...milar medicine which might be perilous. However, it is also nedded to provide ea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...previous cases results not to judge the doctors aptitude in treating similar medical co...
^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s of treatment for new patients, but it shouldnt be the main indicator of that doctors a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08169934641 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49430124973 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2857108162 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332900789417 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10361310689 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985208824611 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17039246743 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993079495605 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.