All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric should replace them .Do you agree or disagree?
Cars that consume fossil fuels such as petrol or diesel must be outlawed and electric ones should take their place. I agree with the statement because electric cars are more environmentally friendly and not so expensive to own contrast to those that burn fossil fuels.
Cars powered by electricity have a reduced environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is created by the fumes from the exhaust of a car will be reduced if electric cars replace them. Also the global warming that the planet is facing with gradually decreased if the fumes are reduced. For example many European country have started to replace them with cars that charge and move with electricity and they have already seen a difference in the atmosphere.
Owning a car which in order to change position and to go to a specific direction burns petrol or diesel means that it should cost a lot of money. Additionally it is extremely expensive to find new sources of fossil fuels, so as a result the cost of them is increasing every year. Moreover, fossil oils are non-renewable resources which means that they will not last forever,therefore renewable alternatives such as electric cars should be introduced. For instance a research showed that the price of diesel the last decade increase dramatically by 58%.
In conclusion I totally agree with the ban of cars that are powered with fossil fuels and the introduction of electric ones because are less expensive and create less pollution to the planet.
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric should replace them.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric should replace them Do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...uced environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is crea...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...d environmental impact on the planet.In addition the air pollution that is created by th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... reduced if electric cars replace them. Also the global warming that the planet is f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...ans that it should cost a lot of money. Additionally it is extremely expensive to find new s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 374, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , therefore
...ch means that they will not last forever,therefore renewable alternatives such as electric...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00396825397 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81143722397 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531746031746 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.1347406423 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.1 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348490383457 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128937318993 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823349844792 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211873436017 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057109853522 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.