The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This chart describes different types of not only fossil fuel but also nuclear and renewable energy forms in quadrillion units that were consumed and its future estimation in the United States.
Generally, the United States depends on fossil fuel combustion to generate its energy. The always rising employment in Petrol and Oil cannot be unnoticed. As it is prospected to increase up to approximately 50 quadrillion units by 2030 with only a minor fluctuation between 1980 and 1995, that might be due to the parallel increment of Coal utilization in the same period, which also is projected to reach 30 quadrillion units by 2030.
The employment of Natural Gas has increased slightly from 20 to almost 25 quadrillion units. It had minor swings till 2010 followed by a stagnation in the next 20 years.
Nuclear energy has increased steadily between 1980 and 1990, then it recessed in the next 10 years. By 2030 it is expected that the nuclear energy will remain almost the same, only would have inconsiderable increase to 7 quadrillion units.
Renewable energy including Solar/Wind and Hydropower had little changes during this period. Solar/Wind energy may eventuality exceed 5 quadrillion units, while Hydropower may become as it was in 1980.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | Moustafa Nofale | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | wardiati | 61 | view |
- Essay topics: Being a celebrity-such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits. do you think being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 66
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 66
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 66
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18226600985 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.857550506 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600985221675 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5827452258 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803810374207 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306906236161 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258316404962 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431019192775 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206349022125 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.