The chart show the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
The bar chart illustrates the comparison of two sexes with obesity in Australia over the period from 1980 to 2010 in terms of percentage.
Overall, the number of men do no overweight women by a significant margin. While both modes were relatively similar between the sexes, there was some variance, especially in male with huge weight percentage, when it decreased throughout the period between 2000 and the next decade. Evidently, the proportion of women has been increasing and almost reaching the same proportion of fat men, as this tendency decreased in the second sex, which was mentioned.
With regards to female fraction who faced the obesity, the general level greatly increased by approximately 15% from 30 to 45% in year 1990 and after the slight rise in the next decade ithas been remained relatively stable by the year 2010.
The percentage of fat males in australia fluctuated over the period, however, the trajectory was more consistent rising sharply in the first three decades from 40 to 65%, by 25%. Meanwhile, the last part of the period has seen the gentle decline by 5% to 60%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2023-01-04 | hi.nguyn91 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | hi.nguyn91 | 40 | view |
- water usage in the USA states and worldwide 78
- household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Harton town 36
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03243243243 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67499308793 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5545881077 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234151251922 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853180122122 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756352283021 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129268205815 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05917286873 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.