The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period
The given table compares the amount of waste that produced by six different countries in the years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
It is clear that there was a significant rise in the waste production in five out of six countries over the period shown. In addition, Korea was the only country that managed to reduce the amount of waste.
By 1980, the US’s waste production was the largest, with 131 million tonnes. Over the following twenty years, this figures rose to around 192 million tonnes, remained highest comparation with any of the other countries at the same time. This trend can also be seen in Japan, Poland and Portugal with from 28 to 53, from 4 to 6,6 and from 2 to 5 million tonnes of its waste respectively.
The amount of waste production in Ireland was the smallest in 1980, with about 0,6 million tonnes, this figures fell suddenly by 1990, before increasing back to 5 at the end of the period. Finally, it is noticeable that the waste production in Korea reduced dramatically between 1990 and 2000, over half of the amount of its waste production by 1990.
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period 73
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons 61
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where releva 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68947368421 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48836071705 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.853652185 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404210262829 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176909022612 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836119241948 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253552405742 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560962318025 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.