The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These diagrams illustrate the present layout of the center of a town named Islip and the future plan of it.
It is clear that a dual carriageway will be built to surround the shops and the north shops will be modified into four different kinds of areas, like bus station, shopping center, car park and new housing.
As you can see in the first picture, there is a main road between the both sides of shops, people can go shopping, park, school and houses by this main road. However, it will become a road for pedestrians only in the future. Instead of the main road, a new dual carriageway will be built to connect park, school, housing and so on.
The shops on the north side of the town will be added other functions. The shops only retain the central part, both side of the shopping centre are bus station and car park respectively. New housing will be placed on the east side of the car park. Also, there will have another new housing on the west side of the park.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45303867403 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19547750749 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.607017004 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631225108806 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347551514193 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405222115123 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541541407878 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526748304101 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.