The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the quantity of consumed fish, beef, lamb and chicken in a country in Europe in the period between 1979 and 2004. Overall, the amount of beef, lamb and fish which were eaten witnessed a downward movement while there was a steep growth in the consumption of chicken in this country during that period.
It is clear from that graph that each person consumed 60 grams of fish, 150 grams of lamb and 220 grams of beef within a week in 1979. However, the consumption of fish per head undergo a mild drop to 50 grams in 2004 while there was a plummet in the proportion of consumed beef and lamb to 120 grams and 70 grams respectively.
It can be seen from the graph that the consumption level of chicken per person reached a peak of 260 grams in 2004 and a dip of 140 grams in 1979 per week and there was a fluctuation in the amount of eaten chicken during the period from 1979 and 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | khanhptk162 | 56 | view |
- Describe an idea you have had for improving something at college or work.You should include: When and where had you had the idea ?what the idea was ?Who you told about your idea ?and explain why you think that your idea made a difference ? 56
- Describe an idea you have had for improving something at college or work.You should include: When and where had you had the idea ?what the idea was ?Who you told about your idea ?and explain why you think that your idea made a difference ? 11
- Describe an idea you have had for improving something at college or work You should include When and where had you had the idea what the idea was Who you told about your idea and explain why you think that your idea made a difference 78
- Describe an important choice you had to make in your life You should say when you had to make this choice what you had to choose between whether you made a good choice And explain how you felt when you were making this choice 42
- cambridge 6 test 4The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 200, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3488372093 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27885470034 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447674418605 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6098580143 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.6 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118138871151 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821332916467 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396157177742 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906611167432 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345935671053 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.