TPO 48 (integrated)_storing medical information

Essay topics:

TPO 48 (integrated)_storing medical information

The reading asserts that recent changes in the habitats caused decline in the number of frogs around the world. The passage supported this notion by 3 main points. On the other hand, the lecturer oposses with the mentioned reasons in the essay. She argues that there is no practical solution suggested by the reading.

First of all, the reading accuses that most of the frogs harmed by harmfull materials by which farmers try to stop tiny animals invading to farmlands. Hence, government must take a law in charge of using harmful pesticides. However, the lecturer believes that it is not a fair solution in a competitive economy for the farmers and concludes to severe disadvantages for them.

Secondly, the writer denoted about the unconvinient effects of fungus and treatments on them which can be applied to a large scale. In contrast, the lecturer points about the ways of applying antifungal medication to each frog which is not only expensive but also time-consuming.

Third, the reading indicates the influence of human activities on frogs habitat. Whether, protection of lakes and maeshes can result to suitable places of living for frogs. Conversely, the lecturer believes global warming and reduction in water is a very big problem to all the species. water development lead a decrease in the number of frogs while, expand of deserts makes the life of lizards harder that before.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-27 jeffhjz 83 view
2017-09-16 alishan2009 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
... a very big problem to all the species. water development lead a decrease in the numb...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07391304348 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71046421432 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621739130435 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3518013912 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7692307692 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306818211374 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917211511486 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755128695636 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163987779298 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330889171559 0.0443174109184 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.