The given material presents the pros and cons for a professor to be a part of a television program and the mere consequences that it has, directly or indirectly, on the reputation of a professor.
To begin with, as per the author he believes that it is good for the professors to be a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the reputation of the professor. However, the speaker believes that such activities would rather harm the image of the professor as many scholars may think that he is not serious in his work and focuses on the entertainment world rather than his field of expertise. In fact, the speaker argues that such activities would hamper him regarding various opportunities like international conferences and seminars.
Furthermore, the author believes that such activities will improve the reputation of the university and also support in the overall increment of the donation that a professor gets for his research. On the other hand, the speaker claims that it would rather waste the time of the professor as he is focused more on the travelling and rehearsal for talk shows rather than his field of expertise.
Finally, the author claims that such activities will give the expert knowledge to the lay man and they can be well known about the various facts. They can also have a detailed knowledge about the topic. But, the speaker denies the claim of the author stating that T.V. shows prefer only intellectual topic rather than an intellectual shows and they actually don't give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general background on the topic which can be easily carried out by the reporters also.
To sum up, the speaker strongly disagrees with the claim made by the author and believes that such activities do harm to a career of an intellectual professional, like a lecturer or a professor; thus, it is wise to avoid such programs.
The given material presents the pros and cons for a professor to be a part of a television program and the mere consequences that it has, directly or indirectly, on the reputation of a professor.
To begin with, as per the author he believes that it is good for the professors to be a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the reputation of the professor. However, the speaker believes that such activities would rather harm the image of the professor as many scholars may think that he is not serious in his work and focuses on the entertainment world rather than his field of expertise. In fact, the speaker argues that such activities would hamper him regarding various opportunities like international conferences and seminars.
Furthermore, the author believes that such activities will improve the reputation of the university and also support in the overall increment of the donation that a professor gets for his research. On the other hand, the speaker claims that it would rather waste the time of the professor as he is focused more on the travelling and rehearsal for talk shows rather than his field of expertise.
Finally, the author claims that such activities will give the expert knowledge to the lay man and they can be well known about the various facts. They can also have a detailed knowledge about the topic. But, the speaker denies the claim of the author stating that T.V. shows prefer only intellectual topic rather than an intellectual shows and they actually don't give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general background on the topic which can be easily carried out by the reporters also.
To sum up, the speaker strongly disagrees with the claim made by the author and believes that such activities do harm to a career of an intellectual professional, like a lecturer or a professor; thus, it is wise to avoid such programs.
- Every individual requires to have a better understanding of the ideas and the concept rather than just learning the facts. 73
- The passage discusses about the mysterious disapperance of the group of the settlers that were living un the Roanoke Island. As the leader, Governor John White had left for England, the colony was never to be found again and suggest various theories regar 71
- "We can usually learn much from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. "; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 66
- The nation should require all the students to study same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- "For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the ge...
^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...an intellectual shows and they actually dont give as information as it is believed. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general backgrou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... be easily carried out by the reporters also. To sum up, the speaker strongly disa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, furthermore, however, may, regarding, so, thus, well, in fact, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82647058824 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78118368666 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447058823529 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7491650565 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.181818182 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9090909091 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361020056282 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153558235704 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22146944276 0.0662205650399 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261477353508 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.253740920023 0.0443174109184 573% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.