Everyone should be encouraged to use fewer resources rather than recycle more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Inspiring the population to consume and produce resources in smaller quantity is more beneficial rather than recycle everything in huge amount. In my view point, people should limit their needs, however, it may not be as efficient as recycling, due to the certain reasons. This very essay represents my opinion on this topic, moreover, in order to reinforce my opinion, I will give relevant examples which will be based on facts.
First of all, it seems almost impossible to convince everyone to restrict their needs in terms of consuming, for example, minerals, water, moreover to tolerate with novel limits. As we all know that any minerals or water is not infinity, so it is useless to save them. For instance, even if we restrict our needs, they will end up one day, whereas by recycling we can get a lot of advantages.
Secondly, limiting the needs of people can affect the standard of living and it can be seen as violation of their rights, because everyone has the right to use the resources due to their necessities. Thus, in order to please the population and to avoid the disagreement from their side, it is the best option for the population to reuse the waste.
Scarcely have I give my opinion with supplementary arguments, I would like to summarize the entire essay and express my opinion one more time. In conclusion, I want to mention that I am more predisposed to the view that I have mentioned in the introduction, that means that I agree that we should recycle everything.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79150579151 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74613204089 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5932424719 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.1 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186591672845 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657908949485 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521677008247 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100814777471 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465602020118 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.