Internet Users as percentage of population
The graph gives information regarding the percentage of the population of internet users in three countries between the years 1999 and 2009.
Overall, there was a considerable increase in internet users among the countries during the time. While nearly all people in the USA and Canada had access to the internet by 2009, half of the Mexican people were deprived of it.
According to the graph, we can see that 20% of people in the USA could use the internet in 1999, compared to people living in Canada and Mexico with just under 5% and 3%, respectively. While rising rapidly in the USA and Canada, reaching 50% of the population in 2002, the number of internet users was growing slightly in Mexico, reaching 10%. After that, in 2003, this trend increased dramatically in Canada, exceeding the USA by 5%, but they reached together at 70% in 2006, followed by a substantial rise in Canada and a slight growth in the USA.
By 2009, whereas almost all Canadian people (99%) and the majority of Americans (90%) used the internet, having access to the internet for Mexican users was just 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britian. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 89
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 67
- Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78835978836 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51523729165 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566137566138 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0577725585 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31598739998 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163109842843 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127664542814 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224613226222 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109698078956 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.