The chart below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travelers in a European country from 1950 to 1990.
The given bar chart indicates the data in percentage of modes of transportation for the year 1950 to 1990.
According to the chart around 5% people chose car to commute in 1950 which increased in 1970 and steady at 25%, but after that, the number of car users raised sharply and fixed around 65% in 1990. Whereas, as is shown in the chart 32% people prefer bike in 1950 to travel but it declined day by day and in 1990 it steady near by 9%.
Between 1950 to 1990, the number of bus users increased from 21% to 32% but as people prefer personal vehicles, the number of bus commuter fell down to nearly 14% in 1990. In the year of 1950 more people prefer to walk to travel as compared to others at 40% b it shrink by the day and it fixed a 10% in 1990
Finally, its clear that cars indeed became the favorite choice as compared with other in over the period of four decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nayan Soni | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travelers in a European country from 1950 to 1990. 67
- people now a days work hard to buy more things. This has made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialism. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This has made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialism.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'steadies'?
Suggestion: steadies
...t it declined day by day and in 1990 it steady near by 9%. Between 1950 to 1990, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...clined day by day and in 1990 it steady near by 9%. Between 1950 to 1990, the numb...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shrinks'?
Suggestion: shrinks
...ravel as compared to others at 40% b it shrink by the day and it fixed a 10% in 1990 ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25443786982 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13633233119 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6320799522 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.8 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227696527422 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138363609116 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637679192767 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140142537827 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090402992178 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.82 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.4 10.3012195122 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.