The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about cloud seeding relationships with hails.
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about cloud seeding relationships with hails. The article states that several pieces of evidence have been proposed about the effects of cloud seeding in protecting crops from hail and provides three paragraphs for support. However, in the lecture, the professor refutes the idea presented in the passage by giving examples and clarifying the weaknesses that the idea has.
First, the passage posits that In the experimental tests can be seen that adding silver iodide to the cold water can prevent the crops from hails adverse impacts. In contrast, the professor rejects this point by saying that even though this method prevents hail's harmful effect, but it can lead to some other problems. In her opinion, cloud seeding makes snow instead of hail but stops precipitations like snow and rain. As a result, it leads to damages differently and creates dry environment lands by lack of water.
Second, according to the article's opinion in some Asian countries, cloud seeding was effective in controlling precipitation in urban areas. The professor doesn't agree with this point of view. She asserts that most of these cities had air pollution, and this method created vapor conditions. Consequently, this process made the atmosphere unpolluted. Therefore, no one can surely say that this way can have a suitable result in unpolluted areas.
Third, the reading claims that the study found that any place that utilized these phenomena, hail damage reduced. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this, suggesting that the reason presented in this section is not convincing. Besides, the woman says that maybe this event occurred due to weather variation.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture contradicted the central standpoint of the reading. Making other problems, working just in the polluted area, the probability of weather variation from the speech demonstrates that the reading's opinion about cloud seeding is in doubt.
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- artifact usage found 3
- TED effect 83
- teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 76
- all universities students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...ck of water. Second, according to the articles opinion in some Asian countries, cloud ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ipitation in urban areas. The professor doesnt agree with this point of view. She asse...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...n from the speech demonstrates that the readings opinion about cloud seeding is in doubt...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29746835443 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68417863293 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.777897641 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4705882353 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267882203321 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973051688391 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.230577780291 0.0662205650399 348% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155675327292 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158758398621 0.0443174109184 358% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.