The percentage of 3 types of crimes: car theft, house burglary & street robbery in England & Wales from 1970 to 2015
The line graph gives information about the percentage of three different types of crime in two countries over the course of 30 years starting from 1970.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the rate of car theft dramatically changed and was always higher than that of the other two crime categories in the entire time.
In 1970, the proportion of car theft was the highest occupying exactly 0.4%, slightly taller than that of house burglary, at approximately 0.3%. Only in 15 years, Car theft rates witnessed a growth like a rocket and it reached a peak at 1.4 in 1995. Meanwhile, the figures for house burglary gradually went up at just under 0.4% in the initial 10 years before climbing to at 0.6% in the sequent ten years. There were significantly fall to 0.8% and 0.4% in the data for car theft and house burglary, respectively.
The number of street robberies was 0.1% in 1970, during 30 years the figures for this kind of crime stayed practically no change, fluctuating between around 0.1% to 0.18%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 44 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 78
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some cities have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings People think that they should be free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013 78
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7808988764 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61913462398 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.576979456 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204668615772 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933235617559 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033643632659 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105196555962 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038193761104 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.