Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. imposing high taxes on cigarettes
The reading and lecture are both about impressive high taxes on cigarettes which has effects on the government and people. The author of reading believes that there are some reasons which demonstrate imposing high taxes on cigarettes has benefits for everyone. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. Professor is of the opinion that these aims are incorrect.
First of all, the author suggests that taxes can prevent people from buying cigarettes and unhealthy foods. This opinion is challenged by the lecture. He says high taxes cause people to buy cheaper cigarettes and if this idea applies to unhealthy foods people, will react the same away. Furthermore, he argues that cheaper cigarettes and unhealthy foods have more harmful substances than expensive them, so these cheaper objects have more bad impacts on people health.
Secondly, the writer contends that tax can be a fair system if smokers pay more taxes than nonsmokers. The article notes taxing people who do unhealthy behaviors can support the medical costs. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that this process is not fair, because the tax rate should calculate based on people wages. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if this system uses to unhealthy foods makes bad conditions for lower incomes than higher incomes.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the high rate taxes cigarettes increase revenue for governments, so governments can use incomes to improve buildings, public education, parks, etc. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that this work produces million dollars for governments then they become dependent on it and do not want to lose it. As a result, this dependency cause governments to ignore some activities like smoking in public areas because they do not want to drop this occasion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-16 | NIMA SAEEDI | 75 | view |
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
- Do you agree or disagree?It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Nowadays, in is not important for people to have regularly family meals together. 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. imposing high taxes on cigarettes 75
- Nowadays, people are busy with many things, if you were given a short period of time, what would you choose?1.Learn to play a new sport you never played2.Learn to cook food in different way 3.Learn to do some hand-made work like clothes 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n cigarettes has benefits for everyone. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...er hand, posits that this work produces million dollars for governments then they becom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18983050847 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56933499814 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552542372881 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6058942193 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178546451296 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071616384644 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053701604006 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115880727133 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632262396074 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.