Essay topics:
The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014.
The pie charts represent the social media which had been utilised by mans and womens in Australia between 2007 and 2014.
Overall, it can be seen that, the proportion of use social media in few of week by women was highest than man. In contrast, in both years never social media had been used by men than women.
Votes
This essay topic by users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | Shivam patel | 22 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | eyraen | 78 | view |
Essay Categories
Essays by user Shivam patel
:
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans
- Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational,otherwise they are a complete waste of time.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 56
- Many people believe that the lecture halls have been replaced by online learning To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he pie charts represent the social media which had been utilised by mans and wome...
^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all, it can be seen that, the proportion of use social media in few of week by w...
^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it can be seen that, the proportion of use social media in few of week by women...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est than man. In contrast, in both years never social media had been used by men ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 33.7804878049 30% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 259.0 965.302439024 27% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 58.0 196.424390244 30% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46551724138 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.75966902107 3.73543355544 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04853417621 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 42.0 106.607317073 39% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.724137931034 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 73.8 283.868780488 26% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0554700853 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421223963605 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273216940674 0.103423049105 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596070295794 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317571042537 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124453622131 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 11.0 40.7170731707 27% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.