Extinction
The reading and lecture are both about whether yellow cedar trees are extinction because of attacking insects or changing in climate or lying bears or not. The passage on the other hand presents three explanations to posit why these are not a adequate evidence. The professor, however, refutes all of those explanations.
To begin with, the author of the reading claims that some insects which is naming a beetle, they feed on wood and bring up danger for trees, thereby, trees eventually become extinct. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that these kinds of unique trees are much more healthy and vigorous to be affected by insects. Moreover, trees are resistance thanks to exist of poison on the surface of leaves and flowers, thus beetle already become sick and die, so this is not a fundamental reasons to be represent.
Secondly, the article posits that brown bears lie down under the trees and utilize the sweet substance of trees which making this liquid to survive, thus bears feed on aggressively and destroy trees. However, the professor maintain on opposite opinion that the huge extinction occur in allover the north America not merely happen in the bears habitant so declining not relate to bear. Therefore, extinctions happen with or without presence of bears.
Third, the reading mentions that gradually revising of climate are consequence of declining in trees. The professor, on the other hand cast doubt on this claim by stating that falling and rising in the temperature are not firm results to extinction of cedar trees. North of America experiences a plethora of times which elevating in temperature, for instance sometimes freeze or be warm, however, this is not a firm reason what killing trees because other trees which are more sensitive than cedar, they are now exist.
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because the spent so much time on the cell phones, online games, and social networking websites. 76
- teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 90
- all universities students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...explanations to posit why these are not a adequate evidence. The professor, howev...
^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... why these are not a adequate evidence. The professor, however, refutes all of thos...
^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bears'' or 'bear's'?
Suggestion: bears'; bear's
... north America not merely happen in the bears habitant so declining not relate to bea...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 513, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...more sensitive than cedar, they are now exist.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59602045874 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6678517838 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172839580833 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784881471823 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976313931157 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116302963408 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375767706999 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.