Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.
Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the notion that preserving endangered animal species from extinction has become a contentious issue. Despite the arguments of some people that such animals provide no contributions to the human and should not be saved by using abundant resources, it is my personal belief that they should in fact be preserved. Two of the principal reasons for this are as follows.
Firstly, it is vital that we realise the importance of the biodiversity in maintaining the balance of nature. animals, plants and human have a dependent relationship which will be destroyed if either one disappears. The disappearance or introduction of animal species will disrupt the food chain and alert the habitat which other animals and plants live. Since ecological change constitutes a potential risk to us and our environment, it is clearly in our own interests to protect endangered species.
Moreover, it is of paramount importance for us to understand that we are liable to protect the natural environment. In order to develop a thriver society, we had disturbed the ecosystem at the expense of many animals or plants living places which causing the extinction of those kinds of species. As we have enjoyed the results of founding richer environment, it is our responsibility to preserve the currently existed species. we should not be a cruel specie that keeping to destroyed others houses and life. we should therefore make every possible effort to save them.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that preserving endangered species is worthwhile. Not only do they maintain our balance of nature, but they also have value in and of themselves.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-17 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
2019-06-02 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e human and should not be saved by using abundant resources, it is my personal be...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Animals
...y in maintaining the balance of nature. animals, plants and human have a dependent rela...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 429, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...preserve the currently existed species. we should not be a cruel specie that keepi...
^^
Line 9, column 511, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...ng to destroyed others houses and life. we should therefore make every possible ef...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19330855019 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98162121845 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2963406987 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7857142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167817294412 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538424567 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633860644602 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104156002698 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506032619594 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.