mvcc
The reading passage argues that the Monte Verde Chile site was not the first human settlement in the america 12,500 years ago. However, the speaker in the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He asserts that the area was actually inhabited by the first hunter-gatherer on the continent.
first of all, the author assumes that no hunting tools or weapons have been found in this wetland and this means early humans did not live in this site. Nonetheless. the lecture challenges this assumption. he indicates that people used primitive weapons, such as stones and bones, for hunting and hence, it's expected not to find advanced tools like spears. In addition, the professor further elaborates that a bone with meat on it has been discovered in the region, which confirms that the dwellers consumed meat through killing animals.
Secondly, the writer contends that the disturbance of the soil by farming, which almost destroyed the site, rendered it difficult to trust the results from the dating process. Nevertheless, the lecturer brings up the fact that agriculture only affected the upper layers and most artifacts have been unearthed in the deeper layers, which were well-preserved. Besides, the main site is in the peat bog, which was never touched.
Lastly, the excerpt holds that the use of bitumen compromised the land and influenced the entire dating process. In contrast, the listening posits that the artifacts have been immersed in chemicals to preserve it for dating. Also, scientists conducted over twenty five tests and the majority of them confirmed the accuracy of thea dating results
- Copper scrolls 80
- lana the chimp 3
- the united states expansive national park system admission fees 86
- Online graduate degree programs are being offered worldwide. In many respects, the programs are like the same degree programs available in a traditional campus environment, but in several key aspects, they are very different.First, online degree programs 90
- People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?Use specific reasons and examples to supp 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...hunter-gatherer on the continent. first of all, the author assumes that no hunt...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...early humans did not live in this site. Nonetheless. the lecture challenges this assumption...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...did not live in this site. Nonetheless. the lecture challenges this assumption. he ...
^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...the lecture challenges this assumption. he indicates that people used primitive we...
^^
Line 13, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmed the accuracy of thea dating results
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, hence, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19696969697 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60779705627 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8560270353 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 7.06452816374 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.