The pie charts below illustrate the number of jounal articles read per week by all students, phD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university.
The circular charts reveal what proportion of all students, phD students and junior lecturers read journal articles at an Australian university.
A quick glance at three pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that the majority of whole students is readed one to five articles. However, in case of phD students and junior lecturers maximum number of readed articles are more than 12 and 6 to 11 respectively.
In the examination of article reading, in entire students, nearly two third learners are readed 1 to 5 articles. This number is upto11 and more than 12 for one fifth and just over one tenth participants consecutively.
In comparison, with whole students, article reading patterns are unique for phD students and junior lecturers. Only negligible percentum of phD students and junior lecturers are completed five artiles. At the same time, one fifth of phD students and quarter junior lecturers have accomplished next six articles. The percentage for more than 12 articles is climbed with 68 and 12 per cent in phD students and junior lecturers respectively as compare to all students.
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced 78
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 79
- The developments in Happy valley shopping center from 1982 to 2012 is represent by maps 80
- The table below gives information about a restaurant's average sales in three different branches in 2016. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...espectively as compare to all students.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10497237569 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86862193205 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5094152642 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470710282819 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210193218153 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129360423932 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314457963778 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153548316543 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.