Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.
Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Advances in technology have made it easier than ever before to reach and interact with people around the world. however, does this mean that it is also easier to connect and form meaningful relationships with others? In this essay, I will argue that while digital communication may be easy and convenient, it is no substitute for face-to-face communication.
Compared to the past, it is now easier, cheaper and more convenient to communicate with people, wherever they may be. technologies such as instant messaging, email, or VOIP (e.g. Skype) have transformed the ways in which we communicate with each other. Thirty years ago, getting in touch with someone in a different country was difficult and frequently expensive. Today, I can take my phone out of my pocket and contact people all over the world at the touch of a button.
While technology may have made it easier for people to communicate, it has not improved connections and relationships between people in any meaningful way. An e-mail, instant messaging software or social media websites can never replace face-to-face contact, because so much communication is non-verbal. we rely on body language, facial expressions and other subtle cues to understand others. In a text message or an email, or even with video chat, those signals are lost. connection between people depends on true communication, and true communication is only possible when people talk face-to-face.
Digital technology has undoubtedly changed how we communicate, and in many ways this is a positive thing. Being able to keep in touch with friends and family in other cities or countries is a great advantage. however, the ways in which we connect and form relationships have not changed substantively; we need face-to-face contact to form meaningful connections with others, and current technology is no substitute for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | manaswi.ielts | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | Traxie_Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | zeborah | 73 | view |
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- the chart below shows information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The paragraph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... interact with people around the world. however, does this mean that it is also easier ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...se so much communication is non-verbal. we rely on body language, facial expressio...
^^
Line 9, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Connection
...ith video chat, those signals are lost. connection between people depends on true communic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ties or countries is a great advantage. however, the ways in which we connect and form ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29194630872 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10086724735 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9787429396 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173408267419 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617470528584 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451001330604 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111389185737 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345299785489 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.