More students are moving from developing countries to developed countries.
Are rich countries stealing talented people from poorer countries? How can people be encouraged to stay in their home country?
Many students of poor nations are travelling in developed nations in order to seek better education and employment opportunities. This essay will discuss that developed countries are not stealing skilled manpower of poor countries and the ways people could be motivated to settle in their own country.
In my view, people from developing countries have specific reasons to migrate to other countries, so these nations cannot be blamed for this trend. First of all, students make their own decision whether to study abroad or not. In other words, graduates aren’t compelled to move abroad rather than they are given the choice of freedom to decide whether they choose to stay or leave their motherland. So, a country cannot be blamed for immigrants who make their own choice. Secondly, developed countries are providing opportunities for people of poor countries to be more skillful. A lot of students decide to move abroad temporarily in order to pursue good standard of education. After completing certain qualifications, these people are equipped with sets of handful skill and education which can be utilized when they return to their own country. To illustrate this, my friend studied web development in Canada 3 years ago and now, he has established his own IT organization to offer web services.
However, various methods can be implemented to encourage people to stay within their home country. One measure is to provide more employment opportunities for students. Many graduates often move to rich countries in order to seek better job opportunities. If people are employed after completion of their education, this could motivate people to never leave their country territory. Another effective method could be the rise in remuneration. In developing nations, pay rate per hour is too low in figures. Hence, people cannot achieve quality of life which encourages them to move abroad for better life. So, if the government offers suitable amount of salary, people will no longer need to seek employment in other countries.
In conclusion, there are clear reasons that rich countries are not stealing skilled manpower and there are various options that can be adapted to avoid people from leaving their home country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | Sagar Gurung | 87 | view |
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 77
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 78
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that government should give money to creative people such as artists and musicians.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period.Summari 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27450980392 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79065833328 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3696905036 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1052631579 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460752723394 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140967849358 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115895621985 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313565222964 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191451187878 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.