TPO 29
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
One of the decesiving factors in a society's development is their academic performance particularlly universities. Some people believe that the universities should increase their professors' earning in order to enhance the quality of university's education level; while others oppose this perspective. In my vantage point of view, paying more money to universities' professors deos not essentially results in improving the quality of university education. In what follows, I will elucidate the most paramount reasons to substanciate my viewpoint.
The first and foremost reason which should be mentioned here is that all of the university's professors do not improve their teaching quality by earning more money. There is no doubt that the education quality not only depends on the lecturers' teaching skills but also rely on students' desire to learn and search. Some professors in high rank universities earn huge mount of money through their industrial activities; so, they do not need university's money anymore. If they want to improving their training performance and as a result university's education quality, they could utilize other practical ways such as proivding searching opportunity for elite students.
The last but not the least reason which should be pointed out is that the university could enhancing their academic performance by spending more money on research equipments that will lead to producing cut-edge knowledge. To elucidate, the more a university invests on educational and research equipment, the more money they earn from industry. It is unambigious that todays' development raises from academic researches; a majority of developed country asserts that investing in academic progress will lead them to the economic growth in a wide variety of ways.
In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to conclude that highering the professors' salary will not necessarily lead to the high quality education in the universities. The first reason is that professors' performance is not the only factor in education quality of a university. Moreovre, universities' education level largely depend on their research labs and equipment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO54 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.tpo51 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 50
- TPO 29Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... which should be mentioned here is that all of the universitys professors do not improve t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arching opportunity for elite students. The last but not the least reason which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...ointed out is that the university could enhancing their academic performance by spending ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...n from industry. It is unambigious that todays development raises from academic resear...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... lead us to conclude that highering the professors salary will not necessarily lead to the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... universities. The first reason is that professors performance is not the only factor in e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, in brief, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60365853659 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07601101568 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515243902439 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8384282883 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261731971905 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101758406455 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870119290017 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169471193025 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580215458775 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.