TPO32-INTEGRATED
Base on the given material, the reading passage as well as the lecture discuss three theories to explain the source of sounds, which were called quackers, heared by sailors in russian submariens in North Atlantic and Arctic ocean. The author states that these theories are viable. that being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the writer proclaims that the ocra whales lives in aforementioned areas and strange sounds heard by the submarines were the calls by ocra whales to attract a male. However the lecturer explains that orca whales inhabit near the surface of water, while submarines were in deep waters. As a result, it is not plausible that the quackers were the sounds of a courtship ritual by ocra whales.
Second, the writer proclaims that the noise was caused by giant squid, a kind of intelligent invertebrates shich inhabit deep in oceans; moreover they are invisible to sonar since they have no bones. Yet again, the speaker underscores that the sound were heared in 60s and twenty years after that, then entirely stopped by 90s, but the squid constantly lived there. Thus,If the sounds had been produced by the squids, there would have had no reason to sudden disapearance of them.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passages is the presence of other countrys' submarines. The author thinks othre military submarines equiped by a special technology, which allow them to be undetectable by russian sonars, caused the sounds unitentionally . On the other hand, the speaker explains that even in this era, human beings could not make submarines that change the direction quilckly and move as fast as the source of the quackers.
- Tpo 29, to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 31 less life satisfaction than the past 90
- TPO 28 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO3- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Agree or not? 80
- Integrated Writing Task: Chaco Canyon: How the buildings were used? Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed on the reading passage. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... states that these theories are viable. that being said, the lecturer provides sever...
^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...calls by ocra whales to attract a male. However the lecturer explains that orca whales ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , If
...t the squid constantly lived there. Thus,If the sounds had been produced by the squ...
^^^
Line 13, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sonars, caused the sounds unitentionally . On the other hand, the speaker explains...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13829787234 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56670914882 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9009795802 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418450642971 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123298038616 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771276405052 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211254429793 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809650911285 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.