More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
It has become a trend among youngsters to move another countries on the basis of their skills. Various people are taking this process negative that by this process developed nations will steal the talent of under developed economies, but others believe that this is not an offence rather it is a batter for individual. I also agree with the second statement.
Developing countries are unable to value the skill of specialists, due to less finance sources and high rate of inflation. These practices create obstacles for skilled person in their survival. So, to receive the smart amount of packages or other no cost facilities like insurance, medical and pension they take decision to shift abroad so that, they become capable to provide quality life to their dependents. Express Entry for Canada is a live example for this. Therefore, this is very helpful for an individual to prove themselves.
Living standard of those countries are very good in case of accommodation, health and transport. Moreover, in those countries there is no place for reservation system. They just value the person on the ground of grades not on colour, sex, religion or caste. To illustrate in India 25% seats in all sectors are reserved for SC/ST category, which means highly educated applicants can just claim for 75% from which 100 seats always used for women. Overall there are very vacancies on which common man can claim. Hence to escape from bias they can use the advantage available for skill trade.
Conclusively, nowadays people are moving towards abroad for residing over there, which are being opposed by lots of people on the ground of loosing talent of their country. While this is not adverse rather better for quality life of an individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | mspoonam | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Sasuke0789 | 93 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | iwat | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | Sayed Khalil | 56 | view |
- Some people think that the internet will replace traditional books in the future. Do you believe this would be positive or a negative development? 73
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger.Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society? 78
- Some people believe that if people are allowed to work after the age of 60, it causes problems. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 89
- Nowadays, people of all ages from certain parts of the world spend more time indoors rather than going outdoors. Why do this happen? Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...acancies on which common man can claim. Hence to escape from bias they can use the ad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06228373702 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55118458009 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615916955017 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1218202069 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990382517957 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324162873335 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312304844495 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648820826624 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230998678665 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.