Do you agree or disagree that children should have jobs the same as their parent`s jobs?

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree that children should have jobs the same as their parent`s jobs?

Work, as we all know, for the majority of people becomes a controversial debate. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard, on the one hand, many people believe that it is far better for children to choose a similar job to their parents. On the other hand, many support this idea that children should choose a different job from their parents. Like many individuals, I believe that choosing a job that resembles the parents is favorable and brings numerous positive outcomes. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.

The first reason that makes me hold the belief that replicates parents` jobs is advantageous is related to the experience aspect. The time that an individual spends on learning and gaining skills in a specific area is called experience. Undoubtedly, time plays a dominant role in our lives as human beings, and its scarcity affects all aspects of life in which the experience is included. As it always said, "experience is the best teacher," so people, instead of devoting their time just on achieving experience, they can use a bunch of experience that their parents already gained. Scientifically speaking, people who try to repeat one of their parents` jobs are highly successful than others because they focus more on their job improvements rather than concentrating on experience various conditions of the job. Indeed, they take advantage of the previous generation's experience and use them as a competitive factor.

Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is eliminating the risk of entering a new field. Without a doubt, people, through doing new works, expose themselves to the myriad incidents that can harmfully affect their career. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that by avoiding this risk, both the variety of jobs in society and one's risk ability decline, an increasing number of people who duplicate their family's job in order to have safety in their work show a different dimension. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, my father wanted to start a new job. My grandfather tried to stop him and took him back to their family company. Unfortunately, uncertain business situations that my father entered in led him to the failure in his new career. What would have happened if he had stayed at his father's business? He would never fail at least.

To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that people who have the same jobs as their parents have not only benefit from a great number of experiences but also endure fewer risks.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-16 Royaaa 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Royaaa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun support seems to be countable; consider using: 'many supports'.
Suggestion: many supports
...ob to their parents. On the other hand, many support this idea that children should choose a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...id, 'experience is the best teacher,' so people, instead of devoting their t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 942, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and use them as a competitive factor. Another equally noteworthy reason to bea...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, at least, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10337078652 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93228376781 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1893822151 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.227272727 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325336979976 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777988010243 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850049465567 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19221075065 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302975935499 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.