There are many different styles of classes at school nowadays. Some students prefer classes where they interact with their teacher and other students in debates and group assignments. Others prefer classes where they just listen to their teacher speak.
As an education system grows, it offers various and new learning styles to match students’ needs. Each style has its own pros and cons; and might be preferred by several group of students. Personally, I believe that interactive classes along with discussions and teamwork would be more beneficial; because, students can learn from each other and practice the teamwork.
First of all, communication between teacher and students during the class gives them a chance to get the concept more easily. Students may bring up different questions or ideas about a topic which assist the entire class to understand the subject more elaborately. Also, debating among the class could help teachers to identify if students need more help with any topic. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About Two years ago, I enrolled in a psychology class. While I had taken several other psychology related classes before, it was hard for me to understand the topics simply by reading the textbook or listening to the professor. I started to ask questions during the class to master each topic. As the class moving on, the other students also participate in the discussion between the teacher and me. As a result, these interactions among students and teacher made the class so much easier for me and help me to get a perfect grade.
Secondly, interactive learning method builds a strong teamwork skill. Group assignments and studies can be the first place for students to practice effective communication and efficient partnership. Therefore, students learn not only the specific subject more comprehensive, but they understand how to work with others successfully. For instance, during my high school years, my teacher had never asked me or other students to work together on any assignments since the entire system was based on self-study. Thus, when I started working, I was unable to work in a team with my colleagues due to the lack of teamwork training.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the positive learning method that promotes interaction, communication, and teamwork would offer students higher level of achievement. This is because active learning in the classroom with questions and answers can lead to massive information exchange that grantees students’ academic success. Moreover, group assignments would help students to experience teamwork which is the building block for future accomplishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | maryam_f65 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Guljahan | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun group seems to be countable; consider using: 'several groups'.
Suggestion: several groups
...ros and cons; and might be preferred by several group of students. Personally, I believe that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29715762274 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9690855757 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.048527501 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313586005578 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951203508659 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582603475088 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17351113593 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751437083566 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.