Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health. Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree. What is your opinion?
It is undoubtedly that utilizing unhealthy food leads to various poor health problems. Many consumers believe that educating about health care systems is an ideal solution, whereas others do not support this statement. In my perspective, I suppose that there are other methods to tackle with this issue.
On the one hand, the governments and health organizations should raise awareness of their citizens about the consequences of using a large amount of exceedingly high nutrient dishes. It is true that fat, sugar and salt are the major ingredients of junk food which make consumers trigger obesity, diabetes and heart disease easily. For example, the authorities can air what these foods contain through social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and organize health campaigns to spread information to residents.
Additionally, schools and companies should promote a healthy diet and regular exercise. Japan is a prime instance in this case. According to the conducted survey of a local newspaper in Vietnam (2015) pointed out that nearly 89.9 percent children in this country had lunch with vegetables and fruits to reinforce their health. Also, the Japanese workers are encouraged to attend outdoor activities instead of working extra-hours to maintain an active lifestyle.
On the other hand, each individual has responsibilities on reducing junk food consumption habits. They should restrict the pre-prepared meals at the markets and eat home-cooking dishes which are beneficial to their physical well-being. As a result, they can avoid additives and preservatives which added in convenient foods.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that there are an enormous amount methods to tackle with this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | fatemeh fazli | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 89
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life,but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 84
- Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health. Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree. What is your opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er methods to tackle with this issue. On the one hand, the governments and hea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to spread information to residents. Additionally, schools and companies shou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ours to maintain an active lifestyle. On the other hand, each individual has r...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves which added in convenient foods. In conclusion, for the reasons I have me...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51291512915 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91279274861 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664206642066 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9626464821 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252468427075 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075630233286 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539328027793 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123427911768 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650951574792 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.