ciggarate and junk food.
I the reading the indicates some methods in order to decrease consumption of ciggarate and junk food.
In the first argument, the reading materials point out that the government should be expose more taxes on cigarette and unhealthy food. This governmental strategy will lead to reducing of cigarette and malnutrition foods since of high cost of it. On the other hand the speaker is disagree with this strategy because of the following reason. First of all, the high cost of cigarette which cause to buying low-quality products that it would be high-risking to health. Moreover, high cost is a concept that it would be high quality. Were the unhealthy to high-cost, the people would purchase buy more and more junk food and malnutrition foods.
Secondly, there are some argument in case of fairing the tax in order to buying cigarette and unhealthy food. I the text posed that the it is unfair that the medical governmental budget waste on someone that do not care about his health with smoking and unhealthy food. Conversely in the lecture discussed that these strategy is not applicable because some reasons. Firstly, there are not homogeneous state of income in the society. These plan will expose more pressure on low-income compared to high-salary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-03 | Marziyeh Khavari | 60 | view |
- consumption of cigarette and junk food 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- ciggarate and junk food 60
- smoking and unhealthy food 65
- Motivation letter of Marziyeh Khavari
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exposed'?
Suggestion: exposed
...point out that the government should be expose more taxes on cigarette and unhealthy f...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...of it. On the other hand the speaker is disagree with this strategy because of the follo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...d unhealthy food. I the text posed that the it is unfair that the medical governmental...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...health with smoking and unhealthy food. Conversely in the lecture discussed that these str...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this strategy' or 'these strategies'?
Suggestion: this strategy; these strategies
...onversely in the lecture discussed that these strategy is not applicable because some reasons....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on low-income compared to high-salary.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 1977.66487455 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 208.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05769230769 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72093298913 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 212.727598566 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8555808394 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212478715568 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798488330538 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117918087253 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206244744411 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153311870332 0.0645574589148 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.